The Great Stirrup Controversy: Why others feel the stirrup’s importance in medieval warfare stirs up more fiction than fact


This gallery contains 11 photos.

The notion of the simple stirrup leading to a revolution in mounted warfare so great it spawned the start of feudalism is a highly seductive theory. So why do some medieval historians remain skeptical? Continue reading

The Great Stirrup Controversy: Why some believe this simple device revolutionized mounted warfare and led to feudalism


This gallery contains 8 photos.

“The plate armoured, faceless horseman,symbol of aristocratic wealth and power, charged knee to knee, with lance couched, galloping in a thundering unwavering wall of steel-clad men and horses, crashing through the enemy lines by force of impact.” This, according to some historians, is what the simple stirrup did for medieval mounted warfare. Continue reading

Did the introduction of the simple stirrup really revolutionize mounted warfare?


This gallery contains 5 photos.

It’s a Medieval mystery that dates back 1700 years, spans two continents and culminates in some of the most famous battles in history. Whether the utilitarian stirrup can be credited with turning man and horse into a single fighting unit “capable of violence without precedent” has been sparking debate among historians for more than a century.
Continue reading